An important tactic the Left use to erode our rights, is to weaken and make subjective, the meaning of words and events. The Left then use cultural pressures, to push people to make decisions in directions they want. For example, rape and sexual assault, were objective acts, reasonable people could agree took place. Now rape and abuse have been morphed into events, which are determined to have taken place, per the subjective view of women. Objectivity has been subsumed in the legal system, and the views of men have become irrelevant.

The Left do the same thing with transgenderism. Instead of courts objectively examining various situations and determining that a man in a dress, is ultimately a man, and should therefore not be allowed in women's sports, the Left push the courts to examine the man's subjective view, and make decisions based on his view. This is discriminatory, because only the view of the party the Left want examined, gets examined: the views of others do not get examined as well, which is a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Legislatures should pass laws (better still, constitutional amendments) requiring courts to examine cases based only on objective facts. The sentencing portions of cases can be influenced by victims’ and others’ views.

Patmore Douglas 10/15/2023 11:09:00 AM


Many people don't realize that Genesis 1 is many things. One of the things it is, is an allegory describing what we all should be - (children of) God who create things. Genesis 1 also indicates how we should go about creating things: we should call them into being. The above is consistent with Christ’s instructions on how we should have faith:

Mark 11

22 Have faith in God," Jesus answered.
23 "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him.
24 Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours.

So we can create things by calling them into being (while believing what we command will come to pass), or we can ask God for things (while also believing what we ask for will come into being).

The above singular act (having faith in God), is what transforms a man/woman into (a child of) God. It is what: saves him; gives him righteousness and makes him righteous; subjects him to trials and sacrifice; empowers him; makes him wise; etc. The life of a child of God, is all about practicing having faith, and accomplishing greater and greater things with it. All the transformations, sacrifices, etc. that happen to a  child of God, unfold naturally, as a result of his pursuit of faith – as Christ instructed how it should be done, above.

Patmore Douglas 10/10/2023 7:02:00 PM


So called ‘gender affirming' care, is very similar to handing out needles to drug addicts. Democrats try to sell these things as acts of love, when they are in fact the complete opposite: snares to lure and entrap the afflicted, in their affliction. 'Gender affirming' care, makes no effort to cure the delusional of their delusions; rather it reinforces the mentally ill’s delusions, and ensures those afflicted with gender confusion, become ever more mired in it, and never escape it. Similarly, handing out clean needles to drug addicts does nothing to help addicts overcome their addiction, rather, it removes obstacles for addicts to become ever more mired in their addiction, trapping them hopelessly in their vices.

The above illustrates the Modus Operandi of the Left: the Left point to marginal, near term benefits of their efforts, as they obscure the long term, devastating effects of their actions. The Left do the above in virtually everything they do. E.g., when the Left opine about how they care about the poor, by providing them government assistance, they fail to mention how their actions create a permanent underclass, which continually votes for them, and which gives them continuous political power. The Left also fail to mention how their government programs rupture the nuclear family, resulting in a host of pathologies affecting the poor, such as high incarceration rates of children from poor, broken families, high mental illness rates, low achievement rates, etc. In fact, the Left further exploit those they claim to care about, by insisting they are victims of racism, even though they know full well, that the poor who depend on them, can never improve their situation, because they are entangled in a system that destroys their families – which in turn undermines their ability to achieve, and not be overcome by life’s problems.

The above underscores the Machiavellian nature of the Left. In virtually everything they do, the Left attempt to destroy society, but frame their actions as acts of kindness and nobility. The Left then use their propaganda apparatus of legacy media, educational institutions, Hollywood, the music industry, the advertising industry, and top multinational corporations, etc., to project their false image of being kind, non-stop.

People typically believe the Left are noble and kind: but this happens because they are subject to endless streams of brainwashing, that insist that the Left are in fact noble and kind.

2 Corinthians 11:13-15

Christian Standard Bible

13 For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder! For Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. 15 So it is no great surprise if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will be according to their works.

The above scripture aptly describes the Left. The Left’s monopoly control over major areas of persuasion (legacy media, education, etc.) is how they maintain the continuous illusion that they are virtuous. People need to ignore the continuous drone of messaging from the Left (by mainstream media, etc.) and examine the actions of the Left, to see for themselves, that what I say above is true.

Patmore Douglas 7/27/2023 10:11:00 PM


As can be seen in the charts below, the prevalence of autism in U.S. children grew dramatically with the increase in the number of vaccines given to children. The following is an excerpt from this article.

'Numerous studied have been completed in the US and other countries comparing unvaccinated and vaccinated children’s health. The results have been unanimous. Unvaccinated children enjoy far superior health compared to those vaccinated.

Autism is non-existent for those not vaccinated. Rates for other childhood diseases including dyslexia, epilepsy, SIDS, allergies, hyperactivity, celiac disease, gluten sensitivity, ADHD, and ear infections were extremely low for those children unvaccinated.'

I believe states should form a coalition, and challenge the FDA vaccine schedule immediately. States should also push for the revokation of immunity vaccine companies enjoy, against being sued for vaccine injuries. Finally, exhaustive studies should be allowed to be conducted on vaccine efficacy vs. harm, by a host of independent organizations.

 

Patmore Douglas 5/29/2023 10:05:00 PM


I hear many conservatives say, that all we need to do is overwhelm voter fraud, with our own ballot harvesting schemes. The problem is that Democrats don't have a "Let's cheat through ballot harvesting" program; Democrats have a "Let's cheat through whatever means" program. This means if ballot harvesting does not allow them to win, they have many other cards up their sleeves - including manipulating computers on the computer networks used to report election results. What we need is an ongoing crowd sourcing initiative to stop Democrat voter fraud. We need experts in mathematics, statistics, computer programming, data science, forensics, strategies, etc. to come up with solutions that can counter what the Democrats are planning. We need experts and ordinary folks, who can counter the experts on the Left.

A running crowdsourcing program to counter Democrat voter fraud, should be regarded at least as important, as campaigning for elections (if not more) in the upcoming 2024 election season.

Patmore Douglas 5/12/2023 7:37:00 PM


I believe a voting system can be created, that is highly resistant to fraud. The system can be as follows:

  1. Create a voter roll database, and require it by law, to be continually up-to-date.
  2. Every candidate in an election, should be given the right to sue the administrator of the database (under penalty of jail time), with evidence that the database is not up to date.
  3. In the voter roll database, assign a unique identifying alphanumeric code to every voter, during an election. Stated another way, every election, assign a unique identifier to each voter on the voter roll, in the voter roll database. Email each voter’s unique identifier to him/her, after this is done.
  4. Upon the commencement of voting, each candidate should be given a copy of the voter roll database.
  5. When a voter on the voter roll is issued a ballot, ensure the ballot contains the unique identifier for the voter.
  6. When a ballot is counted electronically or by hand, the unique identifier on the ballot, along with the votes on the ballot, must be submitted. A ballot submission without a unique identifier, must never be accepted. Further, a ballot that contains a unique identifier that does not match up with one in the voter roll database, must be automatically rejected.
  7. When a voter’s vote is counted, have the vote automatically posted to one or more public websites (aka publicly available voting results screens). Also, email the voter, how he voted. When a voter’s vote is posted to one or more websites, ensure that the information is easily searchable by voters, and includes the voter’s unique identifier, along with how he voted. (Note: only the voter who owns a unique identifier will be able recognize his unique identifier, and hence how he voted, when his vote is posted to a website. The voter’s privacy will therefore not be compromised.)
  8. The system should automatically reject duplicate votes: i.e. ballots with the same unique identifier.
  9. By law, the official tally of an election, must be consistent with the information posted to an official public website, whose information should be mirrored by many other websites in real time.       
  10. Public and private groups, should have the right to request, and have voting results, mirrored to their websites in real time, where they can be monitored by thousands of people, if not more.
  11. All of the above procedures should be backed up by law.

In the above system, only voters on an up-to-date voter roll, can be issued a ballot, or can vote. In order to vote, a voter will need to have a ballot with a unique identifier, that matches up with a unique identifier in the voter roll database. The above scheme would therefore block the counting of ballots, that have been historically fraudulently created by a variety of means, including via mass produced fake, mail-in ballots.

The above system would email users how they voted, allowing users to confirm to some extent, that their votes were not fraudulently counted. Another important layer of protection, would be the publicly available voting results screens. Users would be able to search for their unique identifiers, to confirm that their votes were properly tallied.

The publicly available voting results screen (which would be mirrored) would be crucial to voting integrity. Thousands of people would be able to see in real time, the tallying of votes – as well as shenanigans that might take place. The tallying process would be completely open to observation, and would allow data scientists from candidates, to conduct analysis of the data. This would undercut the closed tallying process done by Dominion, and other shady companies, where shenanigans can easily take place.

Valid IDs and signatures, can be added layers of security. But even if they are not present, the above system by itself, should dramatically reduce voter fraud, wherever it is attempted.

Note: if a candidate has suspicions about the integrity of an election under the above system, he would be able to do things like encourage his voters to take pictures of their ballots, as proof of how they voted. If discrepancies are then seen between voters’ ballots, and how they voted per the publicly available voting results screen, voters would be able to present pictures of their ballots, as evidence.

I believe the above system should be under the direct control of state legislators. It wouldn’t be a complicated system to implement.

It would be crucial to ensure in the above system, that when ballot information is entered by poll workers or done automatically, the unique identifier for a ballot is universally included – otherwise the ballot is rejected. It would also be important that the display of votes, and their automatic tallying, shown on publicly available voting results screens, be controlled from a single trustworthy place.

As for election integrity in Democrat states, unless the Supreme Court rules that there needs to be adequate security and transparency in an election system, for an election to be regarded as fair, and hence constitutional, it seems the only thing we can do, is upend confidence in Democrat election systems, by continually presenting evidence that they are completely corrupt. If neither of the above things happen, then the 2024 elections will be a waste of time, and the United States will sink into tyranny. It might be possible then, to split the country in two, and save the Red states. Things do not look good.

Patmore Douglas 5/2/2023 10:51:00 PM


I believe one of the biggest problems with the Federal government, is that veto power is not given to the people whom Federal agencies regulate. This means that rule making bodies like the EPA, should be able to have their rules effectively neutralized, by some kind of means (such as a petition), made by those affected by their rules. (Remember, America is supposed to be the land of the self-governed.) If for example, a regulations making federal agency like the EPA feels strongly about its rules, it should be able to submit its rules to Congress, to pass them as a set of laws. These rules should never be allowed to be packaged into other legislation. They must be stand-alone legislations, so that Congress can clearly scrutinize them, and decide on whether to pass them, based on feedback from multiple parties.

The above changes would apply to agencies like the EPA, the Department of Education, the FDA, etc. It would make these agencies more accountable to the people, and mitigate abuse on the part of the Left. Environmental policies by the Left, for example, would largely collapse, as the Left would not be able to make end runs around the will of the people, by taking over these agencies, and passing the regulations they want, with near impunity.

Patmore Douglas 4/19/2023 9:36:00 PM


When transgender matters come before courts, opponents should argue that so-called transgender rights, are predicated on the public accepting a person's delusions as real. Therefore, the more basic issue courts have to decide, is whether the public is required to regard a person’s delusions as real - in violation of the public's 1st Amendment rights. Not only that, the courts would also have to decide that a person's delusions preempts reality, and more regard must be given to a person's delusions, than reality. The above would have to be established by the courts, before people could properly argue the notion of transgender rights.

If the courts somehow decide that the public must start regarding delusions as real, and give delusions more weight than reality in court proceedings, people should understand that all of society would unravel. This would be so, because anyone would be able to create fantasies about himself, and the courts would have to give more regards to his fantasies than reality, then apply the law. This means for example, if a guy thought he was the President of the United States, he would have the right to preempt and displace the real President of the United States, from office. However, what would happen if there were ten guys who thought they were the President of the United States? Whose fantasy would be regarded as the most valid, and get to displace the real President of the United States from office?

Our society is held together by everyone regarding objective reality as the pinnacle of truth, and everything else (including feelings and fantasies) as coming afterwards. If this notion becomes upended, so will our society.

Patmore Douglas 4/7/2023 10:54:00 AM


When the Left try to destroy aspects of American society, they always cloak their malevolence in virtuous sounding names. This causes people to be largely accepting of what they are doing. The Left’s Affirmative Action and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) agenda, is among the Left’s latest efforts to destroy America from within. Affirmative Action and DEI destroy meritocracy, which threatens the competence of American workers, and our institutions.

Patmore Douglas 3/27/2023 4:37:00 AM


The Left have systematically brought increasing amounts of women on to their agenda. They have done so through wall-to-wall indoctrination via America's education system, the entertainment industry, social media, etc., where they have monopoly control.

A crucial component of their campaign, is to break up the family unit, and to keep women apart from men, so that they cannot form families. Families are obstacles to feminists' full control over women. This explains why the Left hate trad(ational) women. Trad women popularize the formation and maintenance of families, which mitigate the toxic effects of feminism and other left-wing ideologies - including the psychological hold feminism has over women.

Feminism is about female empowerment. But it is not about the ultimate empowerment of the average woman: rather, it is only about the ultimate empowerment of the women elites on top.

Patmore Douglas 3/16/2023 8:18:00 PM

<>