The Left are on a fervent mission, to absolutely corrupt the children of America, through the use of LGBT ideology. The Left contend, that all forms of love are the same. An empirical observation of human behavior however disputes this, and shows that a society that adheres to traditional gender roles, as well as natural human behavior, are the best performing; and have the happiest, most stable individual men and women.

Patmore Douglas 5/23/2022 9:50:00 PM


The following is commentary on this Rising video.

Yet another indicator that the Ukraine War coverage is a psyop (like the COVID-19 coverage) - not regular news. Whenever you go up against a psyop, the Left attack you in order to help preserve it. The Biden administration's new Ministry of Truth, is probably an effort to offer more sophisticated support to their narratives/psyops.

As for the Right going against freedom of speech back in the 70s and thereabouts. That had to do with pornography, and expressions of profanity in art. The Right was also against the propagation of Communism in society. At least the Right was trying to defend against the propagation of morally negative ideas, that objectively do real harm to society. The Left on the other hand have fought for the propagation of morally reprehensible ideas, and against ideas that challenged them. Also the scales of the attacks are different. The Right fought against relatively small (though influential) interest groups, while the Left have fought against a huge spectrum of our society.

Patmore Douglas 5/4/2022 4:57:00 AM


There are two points I would like to make about Alan Dershowitz’s comments about a federal judge’s suspension of the CDC mask mandate. Dershowitz believes that masks substantially prevent the transmission of COVID-19. The CDC has yet to provide credible studies that prove that masks prevent the transmission of COVID-19. On the contrary, there are at least tens of well conducted studies, that show that masks are ineffective at stopping the transmission of COVID-19. These studies render the CDC mask mandate, arbitrary and capricious.

Dershowitz says rights are a balancing act. Some people have the right to not wear masks, others have the right to not be breathed upon by those who could give them COVID. What about the scenario of highly immunocompromised individuals wanting to go about and live normally in society? Do these miniscule numbered individuals have a right to compel the rest of society to wear masks (or even hazmat suits) so that no one breathes on them, imperiling their health? Or doesn’t the rest of society have a right to live normally, and it is up to these individuals to cope with the dangers, a normally functioning society poses to them? Further, why shouldn’t this principle be extended to the management of COVID-19, given that for most people, COVID-19 is not a threat?

Then there is the matter that everyone’s rights must be stripped away, because of the mere possibility someone may pose a threat to others. Probability is not factored in, where you might say, because someone is showing symptoms of having COVID-19, it is best he is asked to stay home until his symptoms go away, otherwise, he has a right to live his life normally. It is like the court setting the bail for someone who has a record of being an upstanding citizen, and is no flight risk at all, the same amount as a serial perpetrator of serious crimes.

The courts seem to live in this ivory tower, where there are no bad actors, and that there is no necessity for laws to be interpreted in ways that make it difficult for those with anti-democratic intent, to succeed. Courts should be far more skeptical of entities taking onto themselves a great deal of power in a crisis, and should be biased toward adopting alternative solutions, that less negatively impact citizens’ rights and their liberties, in a broad way.

Is Dershowitz aware of the near 100% recovery rate of COVID-19 patients, supplied with early treatments of therapeutic cocktails (that often include Ivermectin) – making COVID-19 far less deadly to those who receive them? What this means, is that the government inflated the risks COVID-19 posed, and allowed many people to die, for political purposes. The COVID-19 pandemic didn’t need to be scary as it seemed – necessitating mandates. The federal government could have pushed for early treatment of COVID-19 with the use of therapeutics, and life in America could have returned to normal very quickly, and most of the people who died of COVID-19, would have survived.

Patmore Douglas 4/25/2022 11:18:00 PM


There are a couple of points I woiuld like to make regarding this Rising video. First of all, no one should call Islam an Abrahamic religion. IT IS NOT. ISLAM IS A PAGAN RELIGION, that pretends to be Abrahamic. The countless atrocities perpetrated by Islam during its 1400 years of existence, attests to this fact. By that I mean the mass beheadings, both male and female genital mutilations done en masse, etc. attest to the true, horrendous nature of the Islam. No other religion has exhibited grotesque evil on a massive scale, as large as Islam, throughout world history.

Regarding the Palestinians vs. Israelis conflict: context should be established before a person makes his or her point about the matter. Palestinians embrace the Islam religion, and their actions reflect the religion's nature. Palestinians wish for the extinction of Israel, and will not rest until they find a way to do so. Palestinians have attacked Israelis with rockets, military incursions, as well as organized crime hits, for decades. Palestinians use their own children as human shields against attacks from Israel. The fact that Israelis got frustrated with Palestinians murdering their citizens recently in an apparently organized way, hardly means that Israelis are the overall bad guys. Finally, Palestinians have no wish to leave peaceably with Israel. The above are why Israel seems so heavy handed at times, when it comes to dealing with the Palestinians.

Patmore Douglas 4/21/2022 1:48:00 PM


One simple indicator that transgender ideology is bad, is that its promulgation has resulted in an explosion (of over 4,000% in the UK) of young people who identify as transgender. The promotion of transgender ideology (which enables and popularizes serious forms of mental illness – including gender dysphoria) is therefore highly detrimental to society, rather than beneficial. How can anyone call the advancement of a philosophy that causes significant net harm to society by large amounts, beneficial, when its effects are consistent with those of psychological warfare? Further, transgender ideology strikes me as being a form of mass formation psychosis, meant to pull society away from thinking in ways that are aligned with reality, so that people’s thinking can be more easily manipulated, by those with an agenda.

Patmore Douglas 4/14/2022 6:46:00 AM


People should not be deceived by the Left regarding transgender ideology. Transgender ideology is about the political enablement of a class of psychiatric disorders, and seeks to hinder their cure – not facilitate them. In other words, transgender ideology is about ensuring that those who suffer from gender dysphoria and related psychiatric disorders, remain in their disorders, and sink deeper into them. Stated another way: transgender ideology is not about curing anyone, or bringing the sick closer to health: it is about preventing this from happening, and ensuring those afflicted with the psychiatric disorders get worse, by creating a society that rewards people who suffer from the maladies with special privileges.   

The Left frame their promulgation of transgender ideology as compassion, and call it social justice. By focusing on the feelings and perspectives of the related class of psychotic individuals, the Left suggest denying them what they want, is a Civil Rights violation. The Right and the rest of society needs to say, isn’t justice about coming to a solution that is fair to everyone – not just to one group of people? If a group of people think they are something they are not, and the rest of society disagrees, and the view of the rest of society is objectively true, how can the courts rule in favor of the group of psychotic individuals? For the courts to rule in favor of gender psychotics, it must say that all rulings before in the history of this country, that were based on objective truths, can be called into question. The courts must say as well, that the 1st Amendment rights of gender psychotics, supersede the 1st Amendment rights of the rest of society.

Remember, the historical solution to gender dysphoria was never its enablement (which is what transgender ideology does): it was about bringing patients back to reality. That is how psychiatry has cured every other delusional individual. That is what psychiatry needs to return doing, when it comes to dealing with gender dysphoria and related disorders.

Patmore Douglas 4/1/2022 3:41:00 PM


Fox News has been worse now, than on the night of the 2020 elections, and this just confirms the globalists' control of at least the news portion of the organization. How does Fox News forego round the clock coverage of our southern border, for a border war in the Ukraine? I believe this indicates that Fox News is being (at least partially) controlled by people who have an interest in conservatives & others, being distracted from the egregious invasion taking place at our southern border. Why do I believe this? Because Fox News would have greater ratings, and see far greater loyalty, if they covered round the clock, the invasion taking place at our southern border, rather than the Ukrainian war.

In addition to above, I'm pretty sure Zelenskyy (who is a globalist operative) is being pressured to prolong the war, by not accepting Putin's neutrality deal, which is of course resulting in his countrymen being killed by the Russians. So you can see how the globalists are influencing the Ukrainian war, as well as coverage of it, towards their own ends.

What you are seeing on Fox News now, is full participation in an actual globalist psyop against the American people, that is meant to distract us from the catastrophes started by the Biden administration, and to psychologically manipulate us into accepting attacks by the Biden administration on our energy industry (the lifeblood of all modern economies) and Putin’s retaliatory measures affecting our food supply. (E.g. the Biden administration is using the Ukrainian war to justify further constricting Americans’ energy supply, which is lowering our standard of living, at an increasing pace.)

The globalists have been trying to figure out how to get western populations to accept a series of events that precipitate their Great Reset program, which is meant to decimate western economies. They tried it with the COVID pandemic with only partial success; now they are trying to do the same using the Ukraine / Russia war.

No one should fall for the suggestion that Chris Wallace’s exit from Fox News, marks the end of the globalists’ influence at the news organization. The Fox News’ Ukraine war ‘coverage’, proves that the opposite is true.

Patmore Douglas 4/1/2022 7:58:00 AM


I believe the consortium of doctors and other scientists who have been fighting vaccine mandates, pushing for the early treatment of significant COVID-19 illness with therapeutics, etc., should try and join with states, to now force the thorough discovery of test and other vaccine data, from vaccine manufacturers, the FDA, and other federal medical bureaucracies. Sue big pharma, and expose them working with the federal medical bureaucracy, mainstream media, big tech and others, to suppress vaccine adverse reaction and death data, and also early treatment protocols using therapeutics such as Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and even Monoclonal Antibody.

I believe a group of states should investigate and launch (in consultation with the consortium of doctors) a series of lawsuits alleging fraud and other wrongdoings, and create the foundation of possibly the largest class action lawsuit, in U.S. history, over COVID-19 vaccine injuries and deaths.

Patmore Douglas 3/5/2022 6:42:00 PM


Note this gesture by Beto O'Rourke.

The above is the same principle as the Biden administration providing spaces and pipes for crack addicts. Yes the addicts appreciate the gesture, as the gesture gives them near term pleasure. The gesture however also makes them evermore lost and mired in their addiction, and hurtles them faster to their destruction.

The Left is now presenting the enablement of severe mental illness (gender dysphoria/psychosis) as acts of kindness. Instead of encouraging these individuals to get psychotherapy, and have their thinking realigned with reality, the Left are pushing these disturbed individuals in directions away from reality and sound thinking, and framing what they are doing as compassion. (The Left are even trying to ensnare weak individuals [particularly children] into thinking they are afflicted with gender dysphoria, so that they can lead them down paths to their destruction as well.)

The above is the nature of the Left in virtually everything they do: they mislead society by pointing to a near term advantage of their strategy, as they obscure the overall long term damage that follows when people do as they suggest. The Left then insist that they are kind, and have compassion in the things they do.

Patmore Douglas 2/24/2022 2:55:00 PM


In my opinion, the main difference between the Right and the Left, is that the Right recognize natural law, and the importance of the adherence to natural law, for things to go well. We are actually no different from scientists or engineers - our sphere of concentration is just human behavior, politics, and (believe it or not) the liberal arts. Just as engineers recognize the importance of innovating consistent with natural physical laws (so that for example, planes don’t fall out of the sky), conservatives believe in the importance of running society, consistent with natural law – as it governs human behavior – so that things don’t fall apart, as we are now seeing in Blue states. The Left on the other hand believe they can do just about anything. They show no belief in natural law (including truth and reality), and recklessly plunge society in all manner of directions, and leave chaos and suffering in their wake. The Right also believe the individual comes first, and the Left believe the collective comes first – hence, the Left do not really believe in individual rights.

Patmore Douglas 2/14/2022 11:59:00 PM

<>