Here are two contradicting studies. One cited by Kim Iverson, that comes from the American Heart Association News website, which is associated with the American Heart Association. The American Heart Association, is part of the American medical establishment, and is likely associated with the pro-vaccine medical cartel, spearheaded by big pharma and the federal health agencies. The other study comes from an independent source. The 1st study is based on ‘a self-controlled case series study of people ages 13 years or older vaccinated for COVID-19 in England between December 1, 2020, and December 15, 2021, evaluated the association between vaccination and myocarditis, stratified by age and sex.’ The 2nd study is based on autopsy data, which is more accurate than the above, because doctors get to see the actual progression of heart disease in individuals, vs. determining its presence through symptoms and tests. The following is an excerpt about the conclusion from the 2nd study:

The direct relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and myocarditis remains tenuous at best. Recent ecological, controlled retrospective cohort and autopsy data do not support an association. The overall absence of support for a specific ‘SARS-CoV-2 myocarditis syndrome’ from focused autopsy studies of presumed myocarditis deaths is consistent with findings from general necropsy studies of COVID-19 deaths. These investigations have established SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to fatal COVID-19 is indeed, as the name implies, a respiratory illness. Wong et al., for example, described how, “No overt pathological findings attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection could be recognised outside of the lung… [B]eyond the respiratory tract [SARS-CoV-2 infection] does not induce any major pathology… in fatal cases.

A systematic review of primarily spontaneously reported data from the U.K., USA and European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA), beginning with vaccine launch through mid-March 2022, found 0.22% (n=30) of 13,571 Covid vaccine-associated myocarditis or pericarditis events were fatal. These data are complemented by a much smaller, but growing autopsy literature. The limited necropsy data characterising COVID-19 vaccine-associated deceased persons with myocarditis and myopericarditis repeatedly affirm heart-related pathologies directly attributable to very recent vaccination. Such findings contrast with the lack of definitive epidemiologic or autopsy evidence for a unique SARS-CoV-2 infection myocarditis, as Caforio et al.”

The 1st study concludes that you are more likely to suffer from myocarditis via a SARS-CoV-2 infection, than from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, if you are over 40. The 2nd study sees no link between SARS-CoV-2 infection and myocarditis, but a strong link between SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and myocarditis.

Given that autopsies are the most accurate way to determine causes of death, particularly from diseases, I put stock in the 2nd study, over the 1st.

Patmore Douglas 8/30/2022 5:44:00 PM

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

The above is the 1st Amendment. It essentially says that the government shall not pass laws regarding the operations of religious institutions, and that it shall not interfere with the pursuit of religion by Americans. Regarding the 2nd point, stated another way, the 1st Amendment essentially says that those who pursue religion, must be able to do so freely, without any interference from the government.

Thomas Jefferson noted in a January 1, 1802, letter, addressed to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, and published in a Massachusetts newspaper, that the above section of the 1st Amendment establishes a wall or separation between Church and State. Courts have cited the above letter, to rule that a separation between Church and State exists in the constitution. However, many courts have not bothered to examine the nature of the wall or separation. All the restrictions regarding the separation of Church and State in the 1st Amendment, are targeted at the state. NO RESTRICTIONS ARE TARGETED AT THE CHURCH. So the wall between Church and State is a one way restriction, which results in the state not being able to touch the Church, but the Church can pretty much do anything it wants (religious-wise) - and the state cannot do anything about it. This means if a kid, for example, wants to lead other kids in prayer in the halls of his school briefly, there is nothing the school can do about it, because the school is an agent of the state, and per the 1st Amendment, it cannot interfere with the kids’ free exercise of religion. What about a school official leading a religious ceremony? Per the 1st Amendment, if he is neither passing rules regarding the operations of religious institutions, nor interfering in the free exercise of the religion, he is not in violation of the 1st Amendment. On the other hand, if the school, which is an agent of the state, tries to stop him, the school would be in violation of the 1st Amendment, for interfering with his free exercise of religion.

So again, the 1st Amendment puts restrictions on the state, but none on religion, and further prevents the state itself, from putting restrictions on religion. This is the nature of the wall or separation between Church and State. (See here for historical background information and events, as well as reasonings, that lead to the development of the 1st Amendment.)

Patmore Douglas 8/25/2022 2:10:00 AM

The following is in response to this video about the Left’s effort at grooming children.

I believe conservatives need to stop accepting the 'moral' standards of the Left. The Left have rebranded age-old licentiousness as LGBT ideology and lifestyles, and I believe conservatives need to spell out how these behaviors are harmful to individuals and society at large, and repudiate them.

Virtually all LGBT behaviors displace opportunities for procreation, and encourage indulgence in base passions or behaviors, at the expense of self-control. Morality is predicated on self-control: therefore if people, children in particular, are conditioned not to have self-control, but instead chase their base passions, this makes it next to impossible for them to lead moral lives. Without morality, society falls apart, because trust, honor, responsibility, etc. (which are all acts of morality predicated on self-control) become greatly diminished, or eliminated. So LGBT behaviors actually pose a very real threat to society, because they undercut procreation, as well as the moral fiber of society, which are necessary for society to exist.

Note in addition to above, the best standard of morality is based on Judeo-Christian values or natural law. An examination of the most successful civilizations over the course of millennia, show this to be true. LGBT behaviors are antithetical to the best standard of morality, which further discredits LGBT behaviors. Don’t believe me? Compare Rome at the time of LGBT Caligula (Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (31 August 12 – 24 January 41)) to America at its founding, with its Christian fathers like Thomas Jefferson. Which society was objectively more moral under these two sets of leaders?

Patmore Douglas 7/5/2022 9:04:00 AM

Prices are soaring, not because of ineptitude, but because of deliberate, subversive action on the part of the Biden administration. The Biden administration has acted in ways that precisely undercut the supply of energy in the United States (from eliminating massive oil and gas leases [also see here], to shutting down pipelines, to adding unreasonable cost in the way of massive regulations, to threatening the profits of energy companies - disincentivizing them from investing and producing more energy). The fact that the hits against the U.S. energy sector are precise and well placed, and not haphazard, or inconsistent, points to the virtual certainty that they are acts of sabotage. Further, the fact that the Biden administration’s ‘green’ energy effort does not seriously consider nuclear energy (the cleanest, most reliable form of ‘green’ energy) but only solar and wind, which are by definition unreliable, and cannot be used to run an economy; means that the Biden administration is setting up America to be destroyed, by transitioning from a tried and true energy sector, to one which cannot possibly work.

Quite simply, America is being bamboozled by the Biden administration. The Biden administration is destroying America, by destroying its energy sector. (Without energy, the U.S. economy will become destroyed – as virtually everything in our economy, runs on energy. The Biden administration is also attempting to destroy the fabric of American society, by destroying the minds of American children with LGBT ideology, CRT, etc. The Biden administration through its allies, are also destroying America by encouraging crime, attacking the nuclear family, etc.) If people ask what the Biden administration is doing, it will simply claim that it is transitioning America to having a green economy. The only problem is that this is a rouse. A green economy based on solar and wind energy cannot possibly work, because solar and wind energy are unreliable, and cannot sustain an economy.

Patmore Douglas 6/11/2022 1:31:00 PM

The following is in response to this Rising video.

Most Americans will not give up their right and capacity to defend themselves against tyrants (kind of like the senile one that is now occupying the White House, who is trying to crash the economy, and destroy our nation). Further, Blue states have the most gun laws, and also by far, the most gun violence. This underscores the point that illicit gun violence is a moral and mental health issue, not a gun issue.

Those on the Left can't be teaching children to forsake natural/Biblical law, and pursue their base / immoral instincts, and not expect bad outcomes. Here is an astonishing fact: if you teach kids immorality (particularly unnatural immorality, like boys dressing up in dresses) they will act in immoral fashion, and you will unleash depravity like you have never seen, because you have conditioned children to establish no checks over their base behavior. The above will cause children’s base behavior (the very dark side of humanity) to grow out of control, and lead to the devolution of our society. Remember, morality is about exhibiting checks and balances over our behavior (using our minds and other faculties), and not pursuing acts, merely because they feel good.

"Do what thou wilt" is the command that underscores the leaders of the Left. It is the chief command from the Satanist Aleister Crowley. This command is a pathway to unimaginable depravity, and it is what is being taught to children in schools, as part of the LGBT agenda. Those on the Left who follow their leaders, should do so very carefully. Left leaders aren’t just political adversaries of the Right, they are extremely evil – and now more and more, the world is seeing who they really are.

Patmore Douglas 5/28/2022 6:10:00 PM

The Left are on a fervent mission, to absolutely corrupt the children of America, through the use of LGBT ideology. The Left contend, that all forms of love are the same. An empirical observation of human behavior however disputes this, and shows that a society that adheres to traditional gender roles, as well as natural human behavior, are the best performing; and have the happiest, most stable individual men and women.

Patmore Douglas 5/23/2022 9:50:00 PM

The following is commentary on this Rising video.

Yet another indicator that the Ukraine War coverage is a psyop (like the COVID-19 coverage) - not regular news. Whenever you go up against a psyop, the Left attack you in order to help preserve it. The Biden administration's new Ministry of Truth, is probably an effort to offer more sophisticated support to their narratives/psyops.

As for the Right going against freedom of speech back in the 70s and thereabouts. That had to do with pornography, and expressions of profanity in art. The Right was also against the propagation of Communism in society. At least the Right was trying to defend against the propagation of morally negative ideas, that objectively do real harm to society. The Left on the other hand have fought for the propagation of morally reprehensible ideas, and against ideas that challenged them. Also the scales of the attacks are different. The Right fought against relatively small (though influential) interest groups, while the Left have fought against a huge spectrum of our society.

Patmore Douglas 5/4/2022 4:57:00 AM

There are two points I would like to make about Alan Dershowitz’s comments about a federal judge’s suspension of the CDC mask mandate. Dershowitz believes that masks substantially prevent the transmission of COVID-19. The CDC has yet to provide credible studies that prove that masks prevent the transmission of COVID-19. On the contrary, there are at least tens of well conducted studies, that show that masks are ineffective at stopping the transmission of COVID-19. These studies render the CDC mask mandate, arbitrary and capricious.

Dershowitz says rights are a balancing act. Some people have the right to not wear masks, others have the right to not be breathed upon by those who could give them COVID. What about the scenario of highly immunocompromised individuals wanting to go about and live normally in society? Do these miniscule numbered individuals have a right to compel the rest of society to wear masks (or even hazmat suits) so that no one breathes on them, imperiling their health? Or doesn’t the rest of society have a right to live normally, and it is up to these individuals to cope with the dangers, a normally functioning society poses to them? Further, why shouldn’t this principle be extended to the management of COVID-19, given that for most people, COVID-19 is not a threat?

Then there is the matter that everyone’s rights must be stripped away, because of the mere possibility someone may pose a threat to others. Probability is not factored in, where you might say, because someone is showing symptoms of having COVID-19, it is best he is asked to stay home until his symptoms go away, otherwise, he has a right to live his life normally. It is like the court setting the bail for someone who has a record of being an upstanding citizen, and is no flight risk at all, the same amount as a serial perpetrator of serious crimes.

The courts seem to live in this ivory tower, where there are no bad actors, and that there is no necessity for laws to be interpreted in ways that make it difficult for those with anti-democratic intent, to succeed. Courts should be far more skeptical of entities taking onto themselves a great deal of power in a crisis, and should be biased toward adopting alternative solutions, that less negatively impact citizens’ rights and their liberties, in a broad way.

Is Dershowitz aware of the near 100% recovery rate of COVID-19 patients, supplied with early treatments of therapeutic cocktails (that often include Ivermectin) – making COVID-19 far less deadly to those who receive them? What this means, is that the government inflated the risks COVID-19 posed, and allowed many people to die, for political purposes. The COVID-19 pandemic didn’t need to be scary as it seemed – necessitating mandates. The federal government could have pushed for early treatment of COVID-19 with the use of therapeutics, and life in America could have returned to normal very quickly, and most of the people who died of COVID-19, would have survived.

Patmore Douglas 4/25/2022 11:18:00 PM

There are a couple of points I woiuld like to make regarding this Rising video. First of all, no one should call Islam an Abrahamic religion. IT IS NOT. ISLAM IS A PAGAN RELIGION, that pretends to be Abrahamic. The countless atrocities perpetrated by Islam during its 1400 years of existence, attests to this fact. By that I mean the mass beheadings, both male and female genital mutilations done en masse, etc. attest to the true, horrendous nature of the Islam. No other religion has exhibited grotesque evil on a massive scale, as large as Islam, throughout world history.

Regarding the Palestinians vs. Israelis conflict: context should be established before a person makes his or her point about the matter. Palestinians embrace the Islam religion, and their actions reflect the religion's nature. Palestinians wish for the extinction of Israel, and will not rest until they find a way to do so. Palestinians have attacked Israelis with rockets, military incursions, as well as organized crime hits, for decades. Palestinians use their own children as human shields against attacks from Israel. The fact that Israelis got frustrated with Palestinians murdering their citizens recently in an apparently organized way, hardly means that Israelis are the overall bad guys. Finally, Palestinians have no wish to leave peaceably with Israel. The above are why Israel seems so heavy handed at times, when it comes to dealing with the Palestinians.

Patmore Douglas 4/21/2022 1:48:00 PM

One simple indicator that transgender ideology is bad, is that its promulgation has resulted in an explosion (of over 4,000% in the UK) of young people who identify as transgender. The promotion of transgender ideology (which enables and popularizes serious forms of mental illness – including gender dysphoria) is therefore highly detrimental to society, rather than beneficial. How can anyone call the advancement of a philosophy that causes significant net harm to society by large amounts, beneficial, when its effects are consistent with those of psychological warfare? Further, transgender ideology strikes me as being a form of mass formation psychosis, meant to pull society away from thinking in ways that are aligned with reality, so that people’s thinking can be more easily manipulated, by those with an agenda.

Patmore Douglas 4/14/2022 6:46:00 AM