Litigating health mandate cases

The Left have been winning health mandate cases, by arguing at a high level. Courts assume that the foundations of their arguments are sound, and as a result, have been granting them their requests. For example, when the Left argue for mask mandates, they declare the mandates are needed for the sake of public health. They however provide no data to back up their claims, but the courts assume that their claims rest on sound scientific data. Similarly, the courts assume that vaccine mandate requests, lie on sound scientific data. They do not. The Left are requesting that the public be forced to take an experimental vaccine, that is the most lethal and injurious in American history – when precedence is for the public being compelled to take an old, and thoroughly tested, 100 year old technology (smallpox) vaccine. Further, the Left are demanding the public take the vaccine to stop the transmission of COVID-19, when the vaccine does no such thing. Lastly, the Left purposely ignore alternative ways of tackling COVID-19 through the use of therapeutics, which are much less costly, and have records of dramatically better success than vaccines, in the U.S. and around the world.

Patmore Douglas 12/18/2021 10:31:00 PM

I believe that the Left have been winning court cases concerning health mandates, largely because they have steered focus on issues, at high levels. I believe the Right can upend the victories of the Left, by delving into the details of the issues, in particular, the science surrounding health mandates. For example, when it comes to mask mandates, the Right should cite numerous studies that show that casually wearing masks, do not affect the spread of COVID- 19. The Right should note that a health bureaucracy cannot make decrees based merely on its authority: there must be actual data and science that back up the legitimacy of its decrees. It would probably also be helpful, if the Right have experts explain to the courts (with illustrations), the mechanics of how the COVID-19 virus can easily pass through the holes present in masks, as well as how the natural fidgeting and handling of masks by individuals, undercut the effectiveness of even the best masks available.

When it comes to vaccine mandates, I believe lawyers should make the point to the courts, that precedence that established that vaccine mandates were constitutional, had to do with non-experimental vaccines. The vaccines in the case, had to do with smallpox vaccinations. Smallpox vaccines were first developed in 1798 – over 100 years old before the time of the ruling. The vaccines had a well established safety profile by the time they were mandated. Contrast the above to the government wanting to make vaccines compulsory, based on never before used mRNA technology, that took about 1 year to develop. What is more, is that the mRNA vaccines the government is trying to force people to take, appear to be the most lethal and injurious in American history. According to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS):

  1. The mRNA vaccines are killing over three times as many people (in less than 1 year) as all other vaccines combined since 1990. That is over 20,000 people.
  2. The vaccines are producing twice as many Life-Threatening Events, as all other vaccines combined since 1990. That is a little under 23,000 people.
  3. The vaccines are resulting in over twice as many hospitalizations, as all other vaccines combined since 1990.
  4. The vaccines are producing twice the number of Permanent Disabilities, as all other vaccines combined since 1990. That is over 33,000 people.
  5. The vaccines are resulting in over seven times as many Birth Defects, as all other vaccines combined since 1990.

Further, an assessment of Pfizer’s own data, released via FOIA request, revealed:

“By February of 2021, Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.”

Contrast the above, with the note from Dr. Peter McCullough, that generally after a drug causes 50 deaths, it is taken off the market (see 19:55 into the clip associated with this article.)

I believe lawyers should request the courts have vaccine manufacturers and the federal bureaucracy, provide detailed test and adverse events information, so that the courts and public can see clearly the level of risk associated with taking COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. I believe this information should also be used to project the increased level of medical issues like blood clots, myocarditis, and autoimmune disease, we can expect to result from the mass vaccination of the U.S. population.  

I believe lawyers should argue that coercing people to take harmful mRNA vaccines, is a significant human rights violation, that goes against the Nuremberg Code.

In addition to above, if the Biden administration really thought that COVID-19 vaccinations were such an emergency, why has it encouraged and allowed unvetted illegal immigration into our country? Illegal aliens effectively belong to a privileged class, where medical mandates don’t apply to them, but apply to the rest of population. This makes medical mandates violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, and are therefore unconstitutional.

Another point about vaccine mandates: if the purpose of vaccine mandates are to halt the spread of COVID-19, how do they accomplish their purpose, when COVID-19 vaccines do not actually stop the spread of the virus among the vaccinated?

COVID-19 vaccine mandates do not factor risk of death to various demographics. Why should Americans be forced to take a vaccine for work, when most of the deaths due to COVID-19, are among a demographic which does not work (the elderly)?    

COVID-19 vaccine mandates do not factor in natural immunity, which is a significantly superior type of immunity - as the latter gives you broad immunity to various variants of COVID-19. Also when you have natural immunity, you generally don’t transmit the virus – something that vaccine immunity does not provide.

Mass vaccinations induce the creation of an increased number of variants, and in that respect, is a danger to public health.

COVID-19 vaccinations cause the phenomenon, antibody-dependent enhancement. Lawyers should make the case, that mandating vaccinations tuned to an old variant of the virus that is gone (the Alpha variant), is not only ineffective at providing protection against other variants of the virus, it lowers your immunity to other variants of the virus, and other diseases as well.

Besides the health risks posed by COVID-19 vaccine mandates, and their ineffectiveness at accomplishing their purpose, there are alternative ways to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. Generally low-cost therapeutics such as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, can be used to treat people with COVID-19 symptoms - provided treatments are started early. The above results in an extremely high survival rate. The federal medical bureaucracy in collusion with big pharmaceutical companies, have been suppressing the above information, and have been pushing vaccine mandates instead, which have enriched pharmaceutical companies by many billions of dollars. Further, hospitals almost universally block or refuse to treat patients suffering from COVID-19, with therapeutics such as cocktails that include Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine. Instead, they allow patients to deteriorate, and when things become critical, they essentially attach a ventilator to the patient, with the high probability that he will die. By contrast, regions like Mexico City and 24 Peruvian states, that have adopted the use of Ivermectin, have seen massive reductions in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.

India’s state of Uttar Pradesh, decided in May 2021, to tackle their COVID-19 outbreak, by distributing kits containing the following medication:

“Paracetamol tablets [tylenol], Vitamin C, Multivitamin, Zinc, Vitamin D3, Ivermectin 12 mg [quantity #10 tablets], Doxycycline 100 mg [quantity #10 tablets].”

Within five weeks, COVID-19 cases dropped by 97.1%. The above contrasts with the neighboring Kerela state, which has no therapeutics program, but has a vaccination rate of 25% - compared to Uttar Pradesh’s vaccination rate of 5%. Per the immediately above referenced article:

“On August 25, 2021, the Indian media noticed the discrepancy between Uttar Pradesh's massive success and other states, like Kerala's, comparative failure. Although Uttar Pradesh was only 5% vaccinated to Kerala's 20%, Uttar Pradesh had (only) 22 new COVID cases, while Kerala was overwhelmed with 31,445 in one day. So it became apparent that whatever was contained in those treatment kits must have been pretty effective.

News18 reported, "Let’s look at the contrasting picture. Kerala, with its 3.5 crore population - or 35 million, on August 25 reported 31,445 new cases, a bulk of the total cases reported in the country. Uttar Pradesh, the biggest state with a population of nearly 24 crore - or 240 million - meanwhile reported just 22 cases in the same period.

I therefore believe lawyers arguing against vaccine mandates, should primarily argue over the scientific merits of vaccine mandates, in the face of alternative, low-cost therapeutics, that have been demonstrated in the U.S. and places around the world, to be far safer and effective.