When transgender matters come before courts, opponents should argue that so-called transgender rights, are predicated on the public accepting a person's delusions as real. Therefore, the more basic issue courts have to decide, is whether the public is required to regard a person’s delusions as real - in violation of the public's 1st Amendment rights. Not only that, the courts would also have to decide that a person's delusions preempts reality, and more regard must be given to a person's delusions, than reality. The above would have to be established by the courts, before people could properly argue the notion of transgender rights.

If the courts somehow decide that the public must start regarding delusions as real, and give delusions more weight than reality in court proceedings, people should understand that all of society would unravel. This would be so, because anyone would be able to create fantasies about himself, and the courts would have to give more regards to his fantasies than reality, then apply the law. This means for example, if a guy thought he was the President of the United States, he would have the right to preempt and displace the real President of the United States, from office. However, what would happen if there were ten guys who thought they were the President of the United States? Whose fantasy would be regarded as the most valid, and get to displace the real President of the United States from office?

Our society is held together by everyone regarding objective reality as the pinnacle of truth, and everything else (including feelings and fantasies) as coming afterwards. If this notion becomes upended, so will our society.