On the one hand, some people would argue that the Left are segregationists, advancing safe spaces, cultural appropriation edicts, etc. But the Left aren't that sophisticated. The Left are little more than impetuous children, who make up rules to justify them doing things they want to do. Often times these rules are contradictory, because they are not based on principled positions.

When the Left want something, they go after it, and eliminate the competition by spouting reasonings against them, that often time contradict reasonings they made in their past. For example, if the Left want to displace white males from certain positions of power, they advance their doctrine of diversity, which frames non-white males as victims of past discrimination. This gives the Left “moral superiority” on the subject, and political capital to advance their cause. The Left then just ram down their agenda through society, with very little opposition. When people challenge the merits of their actions, they simply advance reasonings that they are racists or white supremacists.

What the Left are doing in the way of their doctrine of diversity, is actually discriminatory, because any advancement of an individual in society that is not based on merit, is inherently discriminatory. The Left however don’t care: as long as they get their way. So you have the situation where the Left push for discrimination against a certain section of the population, giving justifications (like White Democrats gave justifications for discriminating against Blacks in the South during the periods of Democrat White Supremacy, and Democrat Jim Crow laws), yet they state repeatedly that they are against bigotry.

Patmore Douglas 11/27/2020 10:58:00 PM


I like this video, it brings to mind the following:

“Without liberty, law loses its nature and its name, and becomes oppression. Without law, liberty also loses its nature and its name, and becomes licentiousness.” – James Wilson, Of the Study of the Law in the United States, 1790

licentiousness:

noun

a throwing off of sexual restraint; lewd character or behavior:

wanton disregard or transgression of laws, rules, or moral norms:

The above is the mission of the LGBT community in America and the West, in the name tolerance. The Left are evil, seen not by their words, but by their deeds – the true test of the righteousness of an individual or entity. Christians should be adhering to God’s standard of morality, not the Left’s. The Left are not more evolved than God, just deceitful. Do not allow the Left to teach society what is right from wrong, because doing so, is leading us to situations like this. We need to kick the Left out of control of our schools, as it is leading to not only political indoctrination, but also moral subversion.

Matthew 5:14-16

14 “You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.

Christians must argue the moral stance of God, in ways that make sense to the rational mind. Adhering to the natural order of our world, seen in natural law, as well as God’s Bible, leads to richer and more fulfilling lives. The more we deviate from natural / God’s law, the more individuals suffer from physical and psychological disease. Also, the more we suffer from societal decay. Cite the studies that prove this, and counter the destructive message by the Left, which pose as liberty and freedom, but which in fact ensnares people into self-destructive behavior, and despair.

Patmore Douglas 11/26/2020 5:45:00 PM


Part of what I would do if I was on the Trump legal team, is for each county or state voter roll, I would call up a random sampling of voters, and ask them:

1) Did they have unusual experiences voting?

2) How did you vote? 

3) Etc. 

I would then look for patterns of disenfranchisement; discrepancies between the postmortem evaluation I’m now conducting, and the actual outcome of the election; as well as other patterns of voter fraud. As part of my analysis of the data, I would consider raising questions like the following:

a) Was a significant amount of people called, no longer living in the state, even though there are ballots on record for them?

b) Was a disproportionately high number of Republicans who mailed in ballots, not recorded as having sent in their ballots, even though they claimed they did?

c) Etc.

I would also create a tool that allows the Trump team to create affidavits online. I would create affidavits for those willing to sign them physically or online – the latter in the presence of notary publics who can verify the signers, and witness their signatures, also online.

I would then take all the above statistical data showing significant anomalies in a range of areas, backed up by affidavits, and try to make my cases in court.

One other thing: patterns that are seen across counties and states, point to highly probable systemic fraud, as well as central planning.

Patmore Douglas 11/21/2020 7:18:00 PM


What is a strong proof of widespread voter fraud? A confluence of high improbabilities, all favoring a single candidate. If you had a handful of improbable events, (roughly) evenly distributed between presidential candidates Trump and Biden, you could dismiss these events as happening according to chance: however, a pile of high improbability events, all favoring a particular candidate, shows with very little doubt, voter fraud has taken place, in a deliberate, coordinated way.

Patmore Douglas 11/21/2020 7:17:00 PM


It is rubbish to say that the founding fathers rated life above liberty. If the founding fathers thought the preservation of life was more important than liberty, the US would have never laid down its men's lives in wars, for the sake of preserving its citizens' liberty. Also the founding fathers' philosophy came from Christianity, where humanity's savior, Jesus Christ, laid down his life, so that all may be free.

Freedom is a greater virtue than life, because when we pursue freedom, we get the greatest quality of life. Only people who are ignorant and are tyrants, push the idea that life is more important than liberty: because doing so, sooner or later, leads to tyranny.

Patmore Douglas 11/19/2020 7:42:00 AM


If a person is protected from a disease via a vaccination, it should be sufficient to have the person who is afraid of the disease, voluntarily take the vaccination for his protection. It should not be regarded as being necessary for others to take the vaccination, particularly when they are from a demographic, that has a 99%+ survival rate. The idea that the government can suspend people’s rights and liberties, under circumstances in which they have done nothing indisputably wrong, should be found repugnant and unconstitutional to the courts. Freedom is the highest virtue in the American constitution – not life. (Certainly not a life without liberty).

The following is taken from this article:

Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it, derived from our Maker. But if we had not, our fathers have earned and bought it for us, at the expense of their ease, their estates, their pleasure, and their blood.” – John Adams, 1765

Without liberty, law loses its nature and its name, and becomes oppression. Without law, liberty also loses its nature and its name, and becomes licentiousness.” – James Wilson, Of the Study of the Law in the United States, 1790

“In Europe, charters of liberty have been granted by power. America has set the example … of charters of power granted by liberty. This revolution in the practice of the world, may, with an honest praise, be pronounced the most triumphant epoch of its history, and the most consoling presage of its happiness.” – James Madison, Essays for the National Gazette, 1792

The courts should rule, that unless the state establishes that a particular person is indisputably a risk to the general public (not a small subset of the public) his actions and rights cannot be abridged (for more than the limited time the government needs to determine the person’s risk.) No room should be given for the government to use a health emergency, to suspend individual rights on a broad scale, and establish tyrannical control. States must manage health emergencies, where preserving individual liberties on a broad scale, is preeminent, as it does its best to save lives.

Patmore Douglas 11/16/2020 4:37:00 AM


I think the Democrats have been using polls as a cover for voter fraud. In Democrat districts, Democrats use polls to have people expect a certain candidate will win by a certain amount, and voter fraud delivers on what the polls predict. I believe this is what happened in 2018, and is why the polls seemed largely correct.

I believe if the opposing candidate wins in a blowout fashion, it takes the Democrats' voter fraud operations by surprise, and Democrats desperately have to come up with an unanticipated amount of fake votes from a slew of places, to compensate. I believe Democrats knew that President Trump would win by huge margins, so they came up with mass mail-ins, as an important means to provide cover for the huge amount of voter fraud they would have to do. I believe in the case of President Trump, the Left's rules changed a bit, and they used polls to suppress Trump voters, and to provide cover to them having Biden winning by massive voter fraud. President Trump caused such a disruption, Democrats could not use polls in the fashion they normally did, and you had the poll inaccuracies and chaos we have seen.

I think fraud investigators should be able to do a post-mortem exam, and see what their models predict the outcome of what the elections in districts should be, by calling up random samples of people; then compare the actual results for those districts, to get a sense of just how bad voter fraud may have been from district to district, in various states. I believe this could be used as a tool to gauge possible voter fraud, and to provide evidence in court.

Patmore Douglas 11/10/2020 3:52:00 PM


Dr. Fauci pushes and provides cover for the Left's tyrannical control of our society, while portraying himself as a good guy, with his polite and gracious demeanor. Fauci manages to convince the U.S. to shut down, and do tremendous damage to itself, while acting as if he cares about this country. Dr. Fauci suggests that America will never get back to normal, unless we jump through the hoops he said we should. Notice how we went from America had to lockdown to prevent our hospitals from being overwhelmed, to, as suggested in this article from Healthline, unless just about everyone is vaccinated, and performs a range of specific behaviors like social distancing, wearing masks (which don’t work unless they are carefully worn like hospital staff), etc., we have no hope of getting back to normal. Dr. Fauci essentially says, that unless we reach the point where COVID-19 poses zero risk to society, our society must be turned upside down, to deal with it. We have never done this before for pandemics/epidemics, and somehow we can’t get over COVID-19 similarly to the ways we got over comparable disease outbreaks in our past.

One way you know with great assurance that Dr. Fauci is disingenuous in his advice, is the way he conflates the risk COVID-19 poses to the vulnerable population, with the minimal risk COVID-19 poses to the rest of the population. Dr. Fauci and those on the Left, purposely use the risk COVID-19 poses to a relatively small portion of the population, as the basis to control society’s behavior, and deprive many of us of our rights. Also the latest therapeutics are continuing to drive down the risk of death posed by COVID-19, to less than 1%, for the vast majority of the population.

Many people think because Fauci has a pleasant manner, he is a nice guy. As Christ said, by their fruits (deeds/major actions) will you know them. Do people really believe (in addition to the points I made above) that even though the average American (along with 34,000 scientists and doctors) can see that lockdowns are highly destructive to our society, Dr. Fauci (supposedly one of the most brilliant minds around) is unable to see that himself? The fact of the matter, is that Dr. Fauci has been the greatest influencer, for the self-harm that was done to the United States. And Fauci did it with a smile. No other external country or force have done this much harm to the United States.

Once again, you measure a man primarily by his deeds, not by his appearance. And when his deeds show him to be a malevolent force, but his appearance show him to be the opposite, you have a particularly wicked deceiver indeed.

Patmore Douglas 11/8/2020 9:08:00 AM


If courts make it difficult to call a new election (e.g. statewide) with evidence of substantial voter fraud, they effectively err on the side of fraud, rather than on the side of integrity - making it difficult for America to have universal integrity in its voting systems. (This is why there is so much apparent corruption in Democrat run voting operations.)

The courts current stance, have put us on the path in which many are questioning whether America is a true democracy, or a little more decent version of countries like Venezuela.

It would be better if the courts made it a relatively easy affair to call a new election on significant evidence of voter fraud - because that would put the pressure on districts to ensure their systems are fair. Again voting integrity is fundamental to a democracy. As best they can, courts should err on the side of integrity.

Patmore Douglas 11/6/2020 8:58:00 AM


An important strategy the Left employ: is they criticize President Trump for not taking a strong enough position on lockdowns, while criticizing him also on the great negative effects lockdowns have had on our economy and citizens' lives. The Left cannot reasonably be for lockdowns, and then blame President Trump for pushing states to consider using them, to help combat COVID-19. If you are for a policy position, you must also be willing to accept the consequences for holding that policy position.

The above show that the Left are not really concerned about managing the COVID-19 pandemic, but are instead more concerned about politicizing it. In addition, Biden indicated that he will shut down the entire economy, as best as he can, if his science advisers tell him he should do so. Given that scientists on the Left tend to be highly politicized, and virtually always advise in line with the Left’s political agenda, we should expect if Biden becomes president, our economy will become decimated by lockdowns, and be no longer able to support its citizens, resulting in mass starvation, mass unemployment, huge state and national economic debts, mass health issues,  etc.

So while Biden criticizes the negative economic impact of lockdowns under President Trump, Biden and his handlers plan on locking down our entire country in such a manner, that it will make the brief economic depression suffered under President Trump, look like a picnic. Globalists (for example those who run the Democrat party) call this the great reset. The great reset is supposed to be a horrendous series of economic and other events for the mass U.S. and world populations; but an absolute ‘fortuitous’ set of events for the globalist elites - who just ‘happened' to simulate an eerily similar coronavirus pandemic at their Event 201, a few months earlier.

Patmore Douglas 11/1/2020 8:29:00 PM

<>