Society needs to say it will not tolerate elevating a person's delusions (or even opinions) above objective facts, when arbitrating matters. It is irrelevant if a biological male thinks he is a girl. He is objectively a male, and must be judged against this objective fact - at least primarily. Arbitrating things from objective facts, is how a society keeps its judgments fair. Further, if a guy thinks he is a girl, and the world says he is not, why should he be right, and the rest of the world be wrong? If we are to primarily arbitrate things from the individual’s perspective, shouldn’t this approach not be equally applied? If a guy thinks he is a girl, and over 300 million people think he is not, shouldn’t the view of each of the 300 million people of the population, count just as much as the guy’s? Any thing short of this is discrimination against the population, and hence the unequal application of the law. That is why long lasting civilizations have always arbitrated matters based on objective truths. If you move away from this standard, society will fall into chaos, and this will be its downfall.

Patmore Douglas 12/31/2021 2:47:00 PM

The following is an excerpt from this article, titled, Bombshell Document Dump on Pfizer Vaccine Data:


“Have you seen the document dump on the Pfizer vaccine data? It’s a bombshell. No wonder the FDA fought to keep it hidden for 55 years.


‘Here is the quick takeaway:


By February of 2021, Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.


Bear in mind, this is Pfizer’s own data.” Election Wizard’




‘This Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure provides data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset of the vaccine project in December 2020 to the end of February 2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a half months).’


Please read the entire article.

So there you have it. Proof that Pfizer knowingly and deliberately released a deadly drug onto the market. State Attorneys General should launch a cooperative investigation into the matter, and have draconian charges brought against Pfizer and other mRNA drug companies, and their boards and executive staffs. Impeachment proceedings should be started against Biden and state governors, for their role in encouraging and coercing the population into taking these deadly drugs. Inquiries should be made into the federal health bureaucracy, and its complicity in this enormous public health scandal, and charges should be made against Dr. Fauci, et al. THIS IS BIG!

Patmore Douglas 12/12/2021 12:20:00 AM

Do people realize that herd immunity can never be achieved with the broad use of the COVID-19 vaccines, because COVID-19 vaccines do not stop those who have received them, from spreading the virus? Instead, herd immunity can only be achieved through NATURAL IMMUNITY. So instead of the CDC recommending the use of (low cost) therapeutics, when someone has a significant case of COVID-19, and in so doing, develop natural immunity with the rest of the population that gets infected by the virus, they recommend an approach that all but guarantees we will never achieve herd immunity, and that we will be permanently afflicted with the virus. I have never seen such malevolence coming from a medical bureaucracy in all my life. Smaller news outlets and states should universally rebuke the CDC and the rest of the federal medical bureaucracy, and states should order their hospitals to start treating their patients suffering from significant cases of COVID-19, with therapeutics. COVID-19 effectively ends, when we have herd immunity, and that is achieved, when we have a large enough portion of the population, achieving NATURAL IMMUNITY. HERD IMMUNITY on the other hand CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, via the current VACCINE strategy we are using.

Patmore Douglas 11/15/2021 11:56:00 PM

Some people, without a lot of thought, believe that Joe Biden runs the White House. They think that, because lots of times when they see and hear him speak, he speaks with some level of coherency, and intelligence. However, they do not try and square away: the times when he speaks incoherently, or seem too tired to read off of a supplied teleprompter; the fact that he is not allowed to speak off the cuff by someone or some group of people in the White House; and his time made available to the public, is tightly controlled and consistently limited. When all the above considerations are factored together, the best explanation, I believe, is that Joe Biden is a front man for another individual or group, that is actually running the White House.

I believe the White House is currently being run by a cabal of billionaire oligarchs. I believe they include Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and Mike Bloomberg. These men are setting the policies of the Biden administration, and ensuring that their globalist agenda is being pursued. They are doing high level strategizing and tactical maneuverings for the White House, as well as ensuring that the White House responds to the COVID-19 pandemic, in a way that is harmonious with how other western democracies are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. (The cabal is doing all of the above, through the agency of left-wing ideologs.)

One way you know that the White House is not being run by a government worker, is the speed and efficiency at which it is moving. No experienced politician like Joe Biden, has ever moved as quickly as the White House has in implementing policy. The White House is moving as if it is being run by people from private corporations. This is consistent with the fact that Tech executives were quickly appointed to serve in the White House, after the election of Joe Biden.

There are other things, such as the fact that the policies implemented by the Biden administration, line up perfectly with the goals of globalists:

  • The open border policy at our southern border.
  • The decreased production of fossil fuels.
  • Vaccine mandates, which are required for globalist, medical, authoritarian control of U.S. citizens. (Integral to the above, is the use of vaccine passports.)
  • The manner in which we pulled out of Afghanistan, where the Biden administration effectively gave Islamic Fundamentalists, tens of billions of dollars worth of military equipment; as well as intelligence on their enemies, in the form of a government database, that listed Afghans who helped the U.S. government when it was in their country. (The above also allowed China to get a hold of advanced U.S. military technology to reverse engineer, and deprived the U.S. from benefitting from rich Afghan resources, while making it all available to our enemy, and key globalist ally, China.)
  • Sabotaging our economy with high inflation, and the attempt to pass massive legislation that would render America a great debtor nation, that could be controlled by China, and globalist banks. The above would also cause inflation to skyrocket further; and result in massive regulations and cost, that would destroy many small businesses, crash our economy, and usher in the globalists’ Great Reset program of destroying the middle class.

Virtually no new program or policy pursued by the Biden administration, primarily benefits ordinary Americans. Instead, Biden’s policies implement the Democrat or globalist agenda, and primarily benefit the elites of our society. For example, Vaccine mandates are an attempt to lay the groundwork for tight globalist control of our society. They enrich big pharmaceutical companies, and are not as effective and cost effective as therapeutics, at dealing with COVID-19. Vaccine mandates instead, turn the U.S. population into guinea pigs for brand new vaccine technologies, that jeopardize the health of the population, while enriching multinational pharmaceutical companies. I’ve never seen anything like this before. The Biden administration’s policies are interested in the concerns of the elites, and only the elites.

The following three points constitute very weak evidence or even indicators, that the following men are members of a cabal running the White House. My instincts are nonetheless screaming at me, that they are members of the cabal.

  1. There is the matter that Mike Bloomberg practically owns the DNC, with the unprecedented large donations he gave during the 2020 elections.
  2. There are minor indicators (that Bill Gates is a member of the cabal running the White House) like the way Bill Gates, the most busybody of the top globalists (particularly in health matters), has been smiling ear to ear (in both his face and body language) since Biden ‘won’ the White House - as if he has a great personal stake in the matter.
  3. Jeff Bezos has shown that he is very political, with: his ownership of the Washington Post, a prominent propaganda paper for the Left; his company (Amazon), that has been purging conservative products from its online store and other facilities (e.g. Parler); etc. While the above offers no evidence that Jeff Bezos is part of a cabal running the White House, it does show it is plausible that he could be doing so.

I believe all of the above warrant an investigation, to see if the basic functioning of the White House and our democracy is on the up and up. If it is not, for all intents and purposes, we are living under a coup. (I believe the states need to quietly look into this, or at least oversee its investigation. The federal government cannot be trusted to investigate itself, and apply appropriate remedies, given its current one-party rule.)

Patmore Douglas 11/13/2021 3:28:00 PM

Trans-humanism is pure idiocy. The tech oligarchs who are trying to achieve it, are no different than the morons who wanted to build a tower to heaven, after the flood from Noah's time. As Christ said, a good tree can only bear good fruit, and a bad tree can only bear bad fruit. Man cannot create a utopia, because he is inherently bad or imperfect. Only God, who is inherently good, can build a utopia. (That is just natural law, which is observable to anyone.) Trans-humanism is an abomination of natural law, as it does not seek to enhance the human experience in harmony with natural law, but seeks to supplant the natural design of ourselves and our world, with designs conceived of by imperfect / evil men. Things can only go horribly wrong. The more you sin against natural (God’s) law, the greater will nature’s / God’s retaliation be. Trans-humanism may be the biggest abomination, man has ever attempted to commit against nature / God.

Patmore Douglas 10/28/2021 7:26:00 PM

Some people say that private businesses should be able to mandate anything they want. Should they be able to tell you to take a vile of poison to keep working? Should they be able to tell you to take an experimental vaccine, shrouded in the highest levels of vaccine injuries and deaths, of any vaccine, in U.S. history? This is not about a business having the right to tell you to wear a uniform to work. This is about the ‘right’ of a business to require you to reveal private medical information, and to order you to take one of the most dangerous vaccines ever made. Also, you are required to do the above, even as a collusion of some of the largest, most powerful corporations in the world, and our corrupt federal health bureaucracy, is working hard to cover up the record numbers of injuries and deaths, caused by the vaccines.

Updated: November 14, 2021

Patmore Douglas 10/12/2021 12:07:00 PM

I believe the Republican party can’t be trusted. I believe conservatives should pursue our objectives, by using any number of conservative / libertarian groups. I believe we should engage with the Republican party when it is in our interest. I however don’t think conservatives should rely on the Republican party on a host of issues, because on these issues, they are effectively an extension of the elites’ ‘Uniparty’.

Conservatives are in dire need of lobbying groups in Washington DC, and all over the country. I believe there is a great need for conservatives to form lobbying groups over social issues, like the celebration of traditional marriage, and time tested Christian principles. There should be lobbying groups over school choice. There should be lobbying groups over political collusion and antitrust issues, as well as how our government treats multinationals – which I believe should be treated as a class of foreign entities. There should be America first lobbying groups, pushing for the interests of local American businesses, and so forth. Washington DC is awash with foreign/multinational dollars and lobbying, and this needs to be rectified as soon as possible, to help save our country.

Patmore Douglas 10/6/2021 4:20:00 PM

Why do conservatives who know that California has a history of significant voter fraud, think that there was no significant voter fraud in the September 14, 2021, governor, recall election? Further, why has it not seemed to occur to many conservatives, that there was likely sufficient voter fraud to overturn the governor recall election? Now it is true that Democrats usually commit voter fraud by cheating in myriad ways, until they have just enough votes to win a race. The problem with this approach, is that it allows their opponents to call for audits. The 2020 elections have seen calls for a series of audits in swing states, that are now a headache for Democrats. So if you are a Democrat leader, how would you cheat in a way that avoids triggering audits in an election? You would win the race by a large margin. Most people would assume that the race was fair, and wouldn’t think to question the election. So if you are a Democrat, and you can use millions of mail-in ballots (which can legitimately be printed from home, or any number of places) to create ballots on demand for your candidate, would you do so? Absolutely! It would be keeping in character with Democrats and their lust for power at all cost, and it would be consistent with Democrats’ behavior of doing ever more outrageous things to stay in power.

So you have means, motive, and opportunity for Democrats to engage in industrial scale voter fraud, and for it to take place smoothly – made possible largely via mail-in ballots. In addition, there have been indicators here and there, that were quickly ignored, that this was likely the case. If conservatives care about free and fair elections in CA, they should demand to see right away, at least random samplings of ballots, and have data scientists go over them for anomalies.  

Given Gavin Newsom’s bouts of fear during the election, I believe there is a good chance that he would have lost in a free and fair election. California does not have an election system that is resilient to voter fraud. On the contrary, California has an election system that is ripe to industrial scale voter fraud (made possible by mail-in ballots). Americans should no longer consider California a democracy – for such a form of government, hinges on a transparent election system, that is resilient to cheating. The downfall of California, has been largely due to the fall of the integrity of its election system. Democrats are seeking to compound that with radical demographic change, by importing new voters to displace the votes of millions of Californians. This is a coup that I hope Americans will fight against, and successfully remedy.

Patmore Douglas 9/16/2021 2:42:00 PM

Per this Wikipedia article, the following quote is the reason given by the Supreme Court, why a woman has the right to kill her unborn child.

‘In January 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision ruling that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a "right to privacy" that protects a pregnant woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion.’

This is the first time I’ve looked into the matter, and I’m surprised America has accepted such a flimsy argument all this time. SCOTUS discounted the fact that an unborn child is a sentient human life form, in order to reach its decision. In my opinion, that is like the courts of old discounting Blacks as being sentient human beings as well, and saying that they can be treated like property. SCOTUS does not have the right to discriminate against an innocent human life, and say in the case of the unborn, they are not worthy of being protected by the constitution. (In fact I think an argument can be made, that the unborn deserves equal protection under the law, and therefore cannot be summarily killed, in an abortion procedure.) In my opinion, SCOTUS was wrong to suggest that anyone has the right to harm or kill another innocent human being, in private.

Patmore Douglas 9/12/2021 5:48:00 PM

This video hosted by Kim Iversen from the Hill, contains an excellent debate. Do U.S. soldiers have a right to express dissenting opinions about their senior command's orders? Do they not have a 1st Amendment right, that trumps any command that can be handed down to them by the military, about expressing their opinions about military and other matters? (This is not about disobeying an order, it is about expressing a dissenting opinion.) Also, is the military obligated to follow its civilian leaders, even if it judges its orders to be unlawful?

Patmore Douglas 9/6/2021 8:11:00 AM