As can be seen in the charts below, the prevalence of autism in U.S. children grew dramatically with the increase in the number of vaccines given to children. The following is an excerpt from this article.

'Numerous studied have been completed in the US and other countries comparing unvaccinated and vaccinated children’s health. The results have been unanimous. Unvaccinated children enjoy far superior health compared to those vaccinated.

Autism is non-existent for those not vaccinated. Rates for other childhood diseases including dyslexia, epilepsy, SIDS, allergies, hyperactivity, celiac disease, gluten sensitivity, ADHD, and ear infections were extremely low for those children unvaccinated.'

I believe states should form a coalition, and challenge the FDA vaccine schedule immediately. States should also push for the revokation of immunity vaccine companies enjoy, against being sued for vaccine injuries. Finally, exhaustive studies should be allowed to be conducted on vaccine efficacy vs. harm, by a host of independent organizations.


Patmore Douglas 5/29/2023 10:05:00 PM

I hear many conservatives say, that all we need to do is overwhelm voter fraud, with our own ballot harvesting schemes. The problem is that Democrats don't have a "Let's cheat through ballot harvesting" program; Democrats have a "Let's cheat through whatever means" program. This means if ballot harvesting does not allow them to win, they have many other cards up their sleeves - including manipulating computers on the computer networks used to report election results. What we need is an ongoing crowd sourcing initiative to stop Democrat voter fraud. We need experts in mathematics, statistics, computer programming, data science, forensics, strategies, etc. to come up with solutions that can counter what the Democrats are planning. We need experts and ordinary folks, who can counter the experts on the Left.

A running crowdsourcing program to counter Democrat voter fraud, should be regarded at least as important, as campaigning for elections (if not more) in the upcoming 2024 election season.

Patmore Douglas 5/12/2023 7:37:00 PM

I believe a voting system can be created, that is highly resistant to fraud. The system can be as follows:

  1. Create a voter roll database, and require it by law, to be continually up-to-date.
  2. Every candidate in an election, should be given the right to sue the administrator of the database (under penalty of jail time), with evidence that the database is not up to date.
  3. In the voter roll database, assign a unique identifying alphanumeric code to every voter, during an election. Stated another way, every election, assign a unique identifier to each voter on the voter roll, in the voter roll database. Email each voter’s unique identifier to him/her, after this is done.
  4. Upon the commencement of voting, each candidate should be given a copy of the voter roll database.
  5. When a voter on the voter roll is issued a ballot, ensure the ballot contains the unique identifier for the voter.
  6. When a ballot is counted electronically or by hand, the unique identifier on the ballot, along with the votes on the ballot, must be submitted. A ballot submission without a unique identifier, must never be accepted. Further, a ballot that contains a unique identifier that does not match up with one in the voter roll database, must be automatically rejected.
  7. When a voter’s vote is counted, have the vote automatically posted to one or more public websites (aka publicly available voting results screens). Also, email the voter, how he voted. When a voter’s vote is posted to one or more websites, ensure that the information is easily searchable by voters, and includes the voter’s unique identifier, along with how he voted. (Note: only the voter who owns a unique identifier will be able recognize his unique identifier, and hence how he voted, when his vote is posted to a website. The voter’s privacy will therefore not be compromised.)
  8. The system should automatically reject duplicate votes: i.e. ballots with the same unique identifier.
  9. By law, the official tally of an election, must be consistent with the information posted to an official public website, whose information should be mirrored by many other websites in real time.       
  10. Public and private groups, should have the right to request, and have voting results, mirrored to their websites in real time, where they can be monitored by thousands of people, if not more.
  11. All of the above procedures should be backed up by law.

In the above system, only voters on an up-to-date voter roll, can be issued a ballot, or can vote. In order to vote, a voter will need to have a ballot with a unique identifier, that matches up with a unique identifier in the voter roll database. The above scheme would therefore block the counting of ballots, that have been historically fraudulently created by a variety of means, including via mass produced fake, mail-in ballots.

The above system would email users how they voted, allowing users to confirm to some extent, that their votes were not fraudulently counted. Another important layer of protection, would be the publicly available voting results screens. Users would be able to search for their unique identifiers, to confirm that their votes were properly tallied.

The publicly available voting results screen (which would be mirrored) would be crucial to voting integrity. Thousands of people would be able to see in real time, the tallying of votes – as well as shenanigans that might take place. The tallying process would be completely open to observation, and would allow data scientists from candidates, to conduct analysis of the data. This would undercut the closed tallying process done by Dominion, and other shady companies, where shenanigans can easily take place.

Valid IDs and signatures, can be added layers of security. But even if they are not present, the above system by itself, should dramatically reduce voter fraud, wherever it is attempted.

Note: if a candidate has suspicions about the integrity of an election under the above system, he would be able to do things like encourage his voters to take pictures of their ballots, as proof of how they voted. If discrepancies are then seen between voters’ ballots, and how they voted per the publicly available voting results screen, voters would be able to present pictures of their ballots, as evidence.

I believe the above system should be under the direct control of state legislators. It wouldn’t be a complicated system to implement.

It would be crucial to ensure in the above system, that when ballot information is entered by poll workers or done automatically, the unique identifier for a ballot is universally included – otherwise the ballot is rejected. It would also be important that the display of votes, and their automatic tallying, shown on publicly available voting results screens, be controlled from a single trustworthy place.

As for election integrity in Democrat states, unless the Supreme Court rules that there needs to be adequate security and transparency in an election system, for an election to be regarded as fair, and hence constitutional, it seems the only thing we can do, is upend confidence in Democrat election systems, by continually presenting evidence that they are completely corrupt. If neither of the above things happen, then the 2024 elections will be a waste of time, and the United States will sink into tyranny. It might be possible then, to split the country in two, and save the Red states. Things do not look good.

Patmore Douglas 5/2/2023 10:51:00 PM

The Left have contended for a long time, that Christians’ objections to LGBT behavior, are forms of hate and discrimination. To many, the Left’s claim seems to have merit. However, when you look closely at the consequences of people adopting the LGBT lifestyle, you become appalled at the highly elevated risks of physical and psychological disease adopters face. You then realize that Christians’ objections to LGBT behavior are objectively and morally sound. You also realize, that the Left have been engaging in an effort to whitewash behaviors regarded by civilizations (for millennia) as taboo, for sinister reasons. In my opinion, efforts to promote LGBT behaviors – particularly to our children – is nothing short of an attempt to destroy American and western civilizations from within, through moral degradation, and the widespread promulgation of psychological and physical disease.

Patmore Douglas 4/29/2023 1:24:00 PM

I believe one of the biggest problems with the Federal government, is that veto power is not given to the people whom Federal agencies regulate. This means that rule making bodies like the EPA, should be able to have their rules effectively neutralized, by some kind of means (such as a petition), made by those affected by their rules. (Remember, America is supposed to be the land of the self-governed.) If for example, a regulations making federal agency like the EPA feels strongly about its rules, it should be able to submit its rules to Congress, to pass them as a set of laws. These rules should never be allowed to be packaged into other legislation. They must be stand-alone legislations, so that Congress can clearly scrutinize them, and decide on whether to pass them, based on feedback from multiple parties.

The above changes would apply to agencies like the EPA, the Department of Education, the FDA, etc. It would make these agencies more accountable to the people, and mitigate abuse on the part of the Left. Environmental policies by the Left, for example, would largely collapse, as the Left would not be able to make end runs around the will of the people, by taking over these agencies, and passing the regulations they want, with near impunity.

Patmore Douglas 4/19/2023 9:36:00 PM

When transgender matters come before courts, opponents should argue that so-called transgender rights, are predicated on the public accepting a person's delusions as real. Therefore, the more basic issue courts have to decide, is whether the public is required to regard a person’s delusions as real - in violation of the public's 1st Amendment rights. Not only that, the courts would also have to decide that a person's delusions preempts reality, and more regard must be given to a person's delusions, than reality. The above would have to be established by the courts, before people could properly argue the notion of transgender rights.

If the courts somehow decide that the public must start regarding delusions as real, and give delusions more weight than reality in court proceedings, people should understand that all of society would unravel. This would be so, because anyone would be able to create fantasies about himself, and the courts would have to give more regards to his fantasies than reality, then apply the law. This means for example, if a guy thought he was the President of the United States, he would have the right to preempt and displace the real President of the United States, from office. However, what would happen if there were ten guys who thought they were the President of the United States? Whose fantasy would be regarded as the most valid, and get to displace the real President of the United States from office?

Our society is held together by everyone regarding objective reality as the pinnacle of truth, and everything else (including feelings and fantasies) as coming afterwards. If this notion becomes upended, so will our society.

Patmore Douglas 4/7/2023 10:54:00 AM

The Left have systematically brought increasing amounts of women on to their agenda. They have done so through wall-to-wall indoctrination via America's education system, the entertainment industry, social media, etc., where they have monopoly control.

A crucial component of their campaign, is to break up the family unit, and to keep women apart from men, so that they cannot form families. Families are obstacles to feminists' full control over women. This explains why the Left hate trad(ational) women. Trad women popularize the formation and maintenance of families, which mitigate the toxic effects of feminism and other left-wing ideologies - including the psychological hold feminism has over women.

Feminism is about female empowerment. But it is not about the ultimate empowerment of the average woman: rather, it is only about the ultimate empowerment of the women elites on top.

Patmore Douglas 3/16/2023 8:18:00 PM

I believe the problem with the poisoning of the city of East Palestine, OH should be dealt with through the formation of a private organization (e.g. a non-profit), whose express purpose is to relocate the people of the city, to wherever they want to live in the U.S., within reason. I believe there should be maximum transparency with the organization, whose records should be required to be made available to the public upon request.

The company should solicit funds from a host of places such as GoFundMe, private charitable donations, as well as from local, state, and federal governments. The company should keep the plight of the people in East Palestine in the news continually, to help drive the contribution of funds from various sources to the organization. Funds should be prioritized to go the most affected, and most vulnerable. The company should provide a variety of real estate listings, down payments on homes, as well as help the residents find jobs, etc.

I believe the company should try and complete its mission ASAP, because I believe the longer the residents of East Palestine remain where they are, the more likely they will develop cancers and other illnesses. The mission of the company should be seen as the evacuation and relocation of the citizens of East Palestine, OH, that must be accomplished as quickly as possible.

Patmore Douglas 3/3/2023 6:23:00 PM

What many women don't realize, was that God designed things, so that women got perspective and structure from men. (Men in turn got emotional and other forms of gratification from women. They also got the perpetuation of their blood lines, etc. from women.)

Women weren't built to be alone. Neither were men. We were meant to complement each other. Feminists however have managed to sway women from seeing the forest for the trees when it comes to heterosexual relationships, and instead have women fussing over every perceived imperfection in men and in heterosexual relationships. Feminists have successfully turned many women from men, and have them view the very things that would complete them, their enemies.

The younger generation knows no history about time tested relationships, and why western civilization successfully developed over a thousand years, under the guidance of Judeo-Christian values. The Left destroyed all of this in our education systems, and have forced the younger generation to repeat the mistakes of civilizations in the past. By the time many women figure things out, it will be too late for them.

Our society is on the path of population collapse, and those affected the most will be women – many of whom will be childless and alone. If our society collapses, the government will not be around to help women – and many men will simply save themselves, as they will have no emotional or familial connection to women. God help us!

Patmore Douglas 1/25/2023 8:27:00 PM

The elites don't give a hoot about the environment. If they did, they would alter their personal behavior to save the environment consistent with their arguments about what causes climate change. Instead, individually they buy more private planes and more yachts, that put out many times more CO2 than the average person. They buy up beachfront properties despite their claims that the locations of their houses, will soon be underwater.

The Left are a distinctly feminine foe. Which means they collectively exhibit feminine qualities in their behavior. For example, with virtually every evil thing they do, they cloak themselves with ‘good intentions’. As an example, cries about voter suppression is the cover they use to rid voting systems of their security, so that they can conduct massive fraud, and render the voting processes they control meaningless, so that they can produce the outcomes in elections they want. Likewise, climate change is merely a pretext they use to impose socialist, authoritarian control over society, which society would never accept, if its members were told the truth about what the elites think about them, and what they would like to do to them. That is why for example, the Left insist on society moving towards sun and wind forms of renewable energy, even though they are unproven and unreliable (and hence by definition cannot sustain a society). That is why they refuse to accept nuclear and hydroelectric energy sources, which are the most abundant and pragmatic forms of clean energy. The elites also willfully ignore the destruction of birds and other wildlife posed by sun and wind energy solutions, as they claim to care about the environment.

There are people who have no idea just how deceptive the Left are. All they have to do is measure the consistent level of discord between what the Left say and do, to figure out their level of deceptiveness. The Left’s consistent high level of deceptiveness defines their character. It is this knowledge of the Left’s character that people must use, to figure out what the Left are truly up to – not what they say. The Left do not really believe in climate change (based on the behavior of elites’ who govern the group). Hence the Left have no real use for technological solutions as suggested here, that can help ameliorate the negative impact of mankind on the planet. As a result, don’t expect the woke Left to respond favorably to solutions other than imposing authoritarian controls on society. Why? Because imposing authoritarian controls on society is what they really want.

Patmore Douglas 1/17/2023 7:12:00 PM