I believe one of the biggest problems with the Federal government, is that veto power is not given to the people whom Federal agencies regulate. This means that rule making bodies like the EPA, should be able to have their rules effectively neutralized, by some kind of means (such as a petition), made by those affected by their rules. (Remember, America is supposed to be the land of the self-governed.) If for example, a regulations making federal agency like the EPA feels strongly about its rules, it should be able to submit its rules to Congress, to pass them as a set of laws. These rules should never be allowed to be packaged into other legislation. They must be stand-alone legislations, so that Congress can clearly scrutinize them, and decide on whether to pass them, based on feedback from multiple parties.

The above changes would apply to agencies like the EPA, the Department of Education, the FDA, etc. It would make these agencies more accountable to the people, and mitigate abuse on the part of the Left. Environmental policies by the Left, for example, would largely collapse, as the Left would not be able to make end runs around the will of the people, by taking over these agencies, and passing the regulations they want, with near impunity.

Patmore Douglas 4/19/2023 9:36:00 PM

When transgender matters come before courts, opponents should argue that so-called transgender rights, are predicated on the public accepting a person's delusions as real. Therefore, the more basic issue courts have to decide, is whether the public is required to regard a person’s delusions as real - in violation of the public's 1st Amendment rights. Not only that, the courts would also have to decide that a person's delusions preempts reality, and more regard must be given to a person's delusions, than reality. The above would have to be established by the courts, before people could properly argue the notion of transgender rights.

If the courts somehow decide that the public must start regarding delusions as real, and give delusions more weight than reality in court proceedings, people should understand that all of society would unravel. This would be so, because anyone would be able to create fantasies about himself, and the courts would have to give more regards to his fantasies than reality, then apply the law. This means for example, if a guy thought he was the President of the United States, he would have the right to preempt and displace the real President of the United States, from office. However, what would happen if there were ten guys who thought they were the President of the United States? Whose fantasy would be regarded as the most valid, and get to displace the real President of the United States from office?

Our society is held together by everyone regarding objective reality as the pinnacle of truth, and everything else (including feelings and fantasies) as coming afterwards. If this notion becomes upended, so will our society.

Patmore Douglas 4/7/2023 10:54:00 AM

The Left have systematically brought increasing amounts of women on to their agenda. They have done so through wall-to-wall indoctrination via America's education system, the entertainment industry, social media, etc., where they have monopoly control.

A crucial component of their campaign, is to break up the family unit, and to keep women apart from men, so that they cannot form families. Families are obstacles to feminists' full control over women. This explains why the Left hate trad(ational) women. Trad women popularize the formation and maintenance of families, which mitigate the toxic effects of feminism and other left-wing ideologies - including the psychological hold feminism has over women.

Feminism is about female empowerment. But it is not about the ultimate empowerment of the average woman: rather, it is only about the ultimate empowerment of the women elites on top.

Patmore Douglas 3/16/2023 8:18:00 PM

I believe the problem with the poisoning of the city of East Palestine, OH should be dealt with through the formation of a private organization (e.g. a non-profit), whose express purpose is to relocate the people of the city, to wherever they want to live in the U.S., within reason. I believe there should be maximum transparency with the organization, whose records should be required to be made available to the public upon request.

The company should solicit funds from a host of places such as GoFundMe, private charitable donations, as well as from local, state, and federal governments. The company should keep the plight of the people in East Palestine in the news continually, to help drive the contribution of funds from various sources to the organization. Funds should be prioritized to go the most affected, and most vulnerable. The company should provide a variety of real estate listings, down payments on homes, as well as help the residents find jobs, etc.

I believe the company should try and complete its mission ASAP, because I believe the longer the residents of East Palestine remain where they are, the more likely they will develop cancers and other illnesses. The mission of the company should be seen as the evacuation and relocation of the citizens of East Palestine, OH, that must be accomplished as quickly as possible.

Patmore Douglas 3/3/2023 6:23:00 PM

What many women don't realize, was that God designed things, so that women got perspective and structure from men. (Men in turn got emotional and other forms of gratification from women. They also got the perpetuation of their blood lines, etc. from women.)

Women weren't built to be alone. Neither were men. We were meant to complement each other. Feminists however have managed to sway women from seeing the forest for the trees when it comes to heterosexual relationships, and instead have women fussing over every perceived imperfection in men and in heterosexual relationships. Feminists have successfully turned many women from men, and have them view the very things that would complete them, their enemies.

The younger generation knows no history about time tested relationships, and why western civilization successfully developed over a thousand years, under the guidance of Judeo-Christian values. The Left destroyed all of this in our education systems, and have forced the younger generation to repeat the mistakes of civilizations in the past. By the time many women figure things out, it will be too late for them.

Our society is on the path of population collapse, and those affected the most will be women – many of whom will be childless and alone. If our society collapses, the government will not be around to help women – and many men will simply save themselves, as they will have no emotional or familial connection to women. God help us!

Patmore Douglas 1/25/2023 8:27:00 PM

The elites don't give a hoot about the environment. If they did, they would alter their personal behavior to save the environment consistent with their arguments about what causes climate change. Instead, individually they buy more private planes and more yachts, that put out many times more CO2 than the average person. They buy up beachfront properties despite their claims that the locations of their houses, will soon be underwater.

The Left are a distinctly feminine foe. Which means they collectively exhibit feminine qualities in their behavior. For example, with virtually every evil thing they do, they cloak themselves with ‘good intentions’. As an example, cries about voter suppression is the cover they use to rid voting systems of their security, so that they can conduct massive fraud, and render the voting processes they control meaningless, so that they can produce the outcomes in elections they want. Likewise, climate change is merely a pretext they use to impose socialist, authoritarian control over society, which society would never accept, if its members were told the truth about what the elites think about them, and what they would like to do to them. That is why for example, the Left insist on society moving towards sun and wind forms of renewable energy, even though they are unproven and unreliable (and hence by definition cannot sustain a society). That is why they refuse to accept nuclear and hydroelectric energy sources, which are the most abundant and pragmatic forms of clean energy. The elites also willfully ignore the destruction of birds and other wildlife posed by sun and wind energy solutions, as they claim to care about the environment.

There are people who have no idea just how deceptive the Left are. All they have to do is measure the consistent level of discord between what the Left say and do, to figure out their level of deceptiveness. The Left’s consistent high level of deceptiveness defines their character. It is this knowledge of the Left’s character that people must use, to figure out what the Left are truly up to – not what they say. The Left do not really believe in climate change (based on the behavior of elites’ who govern the group). Hence the Left have no real use for technological solutions as suggested here, that can help ameliorate the negative impact of mankind on the planet. As a result, don’t expect the woke Left to respond favorably to solutions other than imposing authoritarian controls on society. Why? Because imposing authoritarian controls on society is what they really want.

Patmore Douglas 1/17/2023 7:12:00 PM

The Left are really doing a number on America's children. They are teaching kids all the wrong lessons – many things about the immediate gratification of carnal desires. The Left purposely leave out the long-term effects of indulgement in these behaviors. E.g. the Left stress to America's children, LGBT behaviors over traditional heterosexual behaviors and marriage, even though the former lead to the degradation of a person’s life in the long term, and the latter leads to short and long term security, gratification, happiness, and companionship from a person’s spouse and children, etc.

Like the devil, the Left seduces our children with short term pleasures - and never tell them about the long term disasters that will take place in their lives, if they follow their advice. The Left are doing the same thing to another of their favorite constituents: women. They are effectively encouraging women to engage in infidelity. As usual, the Left point to short term benefits, and hide the negative long-term effects to women, men, and society in general.

The Left love women, because they believe women are gullible. Now feminists have taken over the major areas of the entertainment industry, and are telling women, the more masculine they behave, the more empowered and happier they will be. A lot of women just eat up what they are being told – because they don’t have family members to anchor them to reality. The idea that women becoming more masculine, will make them happier, is of course, preposterous. Men and women have natural (or nature created) roles in society, and the more they veer away from these roles, the worse their lives become. Feminists are like singing coaches who tell singers to all sing outside their areas of excellence or expertise. So feminists say sopranos must start singing base, base must start singing soprano, etc. Things kind of work for a while, but they are leading to disasters – because many women are leading sub-optimal lives. Teaching women that they don’t need a man, or to have children after their prime years, makes them less optimal at forming families and having children. These women are likely to grow old alone without companionship from spouses, or being taken care of by their children. What is going to happen to them when they are too feeble to take care of themselves? Who will fight for them – given they have no children? Even if they have money, chances are they will be taken advantage of, and robbed by their non-familial caretakers.

The Left are apostles of Satan, and they have taught women countless lies, and many are now on their way to ruin – and will take society with them through population collapse. The Left are also trying to mislead our children with appalling ideologies like transgenderism. Protect your children from the Left. Protect women also by fighting to destroy feminism – which did a few good things to gain credibility, but which is now effectively causing great carnage in the lives of women, which will be increasingly evident in the years to come.

Patmore Douglas 11/21/2022 7:02:00 AM

Larry Elder said in this video, said that the civil rights movement was (in some respects) a mistake. The civil rights movement was never a mistake: it was a scam! It was one of the clearest examples of the Modus Operandi of the Left: misdirect everyone into thinking that you are doing something noble, and put your alleged good deed forever in the spotlight (with the help of your media proxies and others). As the above go on, siphon some of the tax payer money that underwrites the program, into your donors' and your own pockets, and create a state of dependency, where the beneficiaries of the government program depend on you for their welfare, and keep voting for you, to ensure that the program continues. Do people think that the Left seriously do not realize that what is holding back much of the Black community, is fatherlessness? That is why they have never passed policies that remedy the situation. They are milking the misery of Black Americans for political gain: having an underclass that can never rise up because of the problem of fatherlessness, while contending their lack of progress, has always been due to systemic racism. It is the perfect scam!

Government programs by Democrats aren't primarily to help people out: they are there primarily to breed government dependency by the US population, and to give Democrat politicians wealth and power. The Democrats copied what charities used to do a great deal, and used that as a pretext to grow the government.

Those who say that a government program can never be eliminated are wrong. All you have to do is have the government contract out the work to private companies, or have the government form an ecosystem of private actors, who compete to carry out the function of the government program. For example, replace our current public education system with competing private learning institutions, and let government financial support follow the kids, rather than the schools. Sell off VA properties, and turn the VA into an insurance company for veterans. You will decrease the size of government, improve services for veterans on a permanent basis, because you will increase competition among the services veterans use, and you will save money. Social Security, Medicare, etc. can all be privatized to allow people to continue enjoying the benefits of these government programs, while making these social programs more efficient, and less prone to insolvency.

The Democrat party is a phony party through and through with its government programs. Conservatives however do not have to embrace Democrat government expansionism in order to be popular with voters. Conservatives can shrink the size government, while maintaining government programs - in private forms.

Patmore Douglas 10/20/2022 4:46:00 AM

Here are two contradicting studies. One cited by Kim Iverson, that comes from the American Heart Association News website, which is associated with the American Heart Association. The American Heart Association, is part of the American medical establishment, and is likely associated with the pro-vaccine medical cartel, spearheaded by big pharma and the federal health agencies. The other study comes from an independent source. The 1^st study is based on ‘a self-controlled case series study of people ages 13 years or older vaccinated for COVID-19 in England between December 1, 2020, and December 15, 2021, evaluated the association between vaccination and myocarditis, stratified by age and sex.’ The 2^nd study is based on autopsy data, which is more accurate than the above, because doctors get to see the actual progression of heart disease in individuals, vs. determining its presence through symptoms and tests. The following is an excerpt about the conclusion from the 2^nd study:

The direct relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and myocarditis remains tenuous at best. Recent ecological, controlled retrospective cohort and autopsy data do not support an association. The overall absence of support for a specific ‘SARS-CoV-2 myocarditis syndrome’ from focused autopsy studies of presumed myocarditis deaths is consistent with findings from general necropsy studies of COVID-19 deaths. These investigations have established SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to fatal COVID-19 is indeed, as the name implies, a respiratory illness. Wong et al., for example, described how, “No overt pathological findings attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection could be recognised outside of the lung… [B]eyond the respiratory tract [SARS-CoV-2 infection] does not induce any major pathology… in fatal cases.

A systematic review of primarily spontaneously reported data from the U.K., USA and European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA), beginning with vaccine launch through mid-March 2022, found 0.22% (n=30) of 13,571 Covid vaccine-associated myocarditis or pericarditis events were fatal. These data are complemented by a much smaller, but growing autopsy literature. The limited necropsy data characterising COVID-19 vaccine-associated deceased persons with myocarditis and myopericarditis repeatedly affirm heart-related pathologies directly attributable to very recent vaccination. Such findings contrast with the lack of definitive epidemiologic or autopsy evidence for a unique SARS-CoV-2 infection myocarditis, as Caforio et al.”

The 1^st study concludes that you are more likely to suffer from myocarditis via a SARS-CoV-2 infection, than from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, if you are over 40. The 2^nd study sees no link between SARS-CoV-2 infection and myocarditis, but a strong link between SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and myocarditis.

Given that autopsies are the most accurate way to determine causes of death, particularly from diseases, I put stock in the 2^nd study, over the 1^st.

Patmore Douglas 8/30/2022 5:44:00 PM

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

The above is the 1^st Amendment. It essentially says that the government shall not pass laws regarding the operations of religious institutions, and that it shall not interfere with the pursuit of religion by Americans. Regarding the 2^nd point, stated another way, the 1^st Amendment essentially says that those who pursue religion, must be able to do so freely, without any interference from the government.

Thomas Jefferson noted in a January 1, 1802, letter, addressed to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, and published in a Massachusetts newspaper, that the above section of the 1^st Amendment establishes a wall or separation between Church and State. Courts have cited the above letter, to rule that a separation between Church and State exists in the constitution. However, many courts have not bothered to examine the nature of the wall or separation. All the restrictions regarding the separation of Church and State in the 1^st Amendment, are targeted at the state. NO RESTRICTIONS ARE TARGETED AT THE CHURCH. So the wall between Church and State is a one way restriction, which results in the state not being able to touch the Church, but the Church can pretty much do anything it wants (religious-wise) - and the state cannot do anything about it. This means if a kid, for example, wants to lead other kids in prayer in the halls of his school briefly, there is nothing the school can do about it, because the school is an agent of the state, and per the 1^st Amendment, it cannot interfere with the kids’ free exercise of religion. What about a school official leading a religious ceremony? Per the 1^st Amendment, if he is neither passing rules regarding the operations of religious institutions, nor interfering in the free exercise of the religion, he is not in violation of the 1^st Amendment. On the other hand, if the school, which is an agent of the state, tries to stop him, the school would be in violation of the 1^st Amendment, for interfering with his free exercise of religion.

So again, the 1^st Amendment puts restrictions on the state, but none on religion, and further prevents the state itself, from putting restrictions on religion. This is the nature of the wall or separation between Church and State. (See here for historical background information and events, as well as reasonings, that lead to the development of the 1^st Amendment.)

Patmore Douglas 8/25/2022 2:10:00 AM